Guests&Signed in Players

[Catsbit.Care 903]

Hi there, 

Finally Google increased the limit of possible authorizations in our game per day.

We were planning to limit the number of servers for guests (keep 3-4 servers for guests), and to make all the others servers available only for authorized players. We think that this can significantly reduce the number of cheaters in games, but the whole number of players in game will also reduce. 

Now our question is: is it worth it? 

[[𝐂𝐂] 𝐱𝐀𝐧𝐨𝐧𝐲 435]

Hey, this is infact a awesome idea.

But make like 3 servers. [Guests] or starter. Just something like that.

2 with PvP <Server

1 PvE < Server 

And this server will not being monitored by anyone. What will make it an anarchy servers. 

 

But it comes with a catch. Remove the rocket launcher, Hunting Rifle,  Assault Rifle. Why you ask??

This makes new players to learn about the other things in the game. And it basically deals with the cheaters a little down there at the Guests servers

[xadamx 16]

I don't want to say to much because I feel I've been aplocked (splocked) but you know. 1 PVE isn't enough. I'm telling PVE is great, ..until you added the breaking of barrels. How dare ruin PVE for players like minded. It's unheard of. I gotta tell ya. PVE with limited funds. Is AWWWESOME. But when you changed the parameters. You slaughtered it. Are you still laughing because I am not. And I won't tolerate it . Etc etc 

You sometimes make some really poor decisions. Like this one time. I cooked a bug in the microwave. It was a bad decision. Like allowing barrels. Defenseless barrels, to be broken into. How could ya. 

 

Btw, I make like 4 dozen rockets. Logged out for the night. And since then haven't been ABLE to log in allll friggin day. Excuse my temperature. But seriously.  Obviously something's gotta give. I paid 15 dollars just so yous could aplock(splock) me, my IP address has never had to deal with such lowly intelligence. I swear of their were a whipping block. You know whose head would be on it. Forgive my poor choice of words. I am a poor man

[xadamx 16]

-.-

[xadamx 16]

And I was thinking of spending more money. However when I did the maths, on 2000 rkts and quadriple launchers packed to my hip, I realised your servers and service is not longer wanted. And can't handle me(firepower

[xadamx 16]

I once felt like this once. The walls trembled and Jericho fell.

[xadamx 16]

Have you ever watch that movie, the Rocketman. I'm going to sit back, chill and enjoy watching it again and again. Because, 

[Енотик08 5]

4 часа назад, Catsbit.Care сказал:

Hi there, 

Finally Google increased the limit of possible authorizations in our game per day.

We were planning to limit the number of servers for guests (keep 3-4 servers for guests), and to make all the others servers available only for authorized players. We think that this can significantly reduce the number of cheaters in games, but the whole number of players in game will also reduce. 

Now our question is: is it worth it? 

В какие сроки вступят изменения ?

[Peenerweener 30]

This is an awesome idea.

this limits cheaters, because it makes it harder for them to keep creating Google accounts. 

I agree with this change. 

[Sunkars 0]

13.07.2022 в 15:14, Catsbit.Care сказал:

Hi there, 

Finally Google increased the limit of possible authorizations in our game per day.

We were planning to limit the number of servers for guests (keep 3-4 servers for guests), and to make all the others servers available only for authorized players. We think that this can significantly reduce the number of cheaters in games, but the whole number of players in game will also reduce. 

Now our question is: is it worth it? 

Я согласен, когда это добавите?